“Right when I suddenly had more blue sky in front of me than green truck, I remembered that when I was little I used to be very interested in the fact that anything, no matter how rough, rusted, dirty, or otherwise discredited it was, looked good if you set it down on a stretch of white cloth or any kind of clean background.” (38)
In class, we have talked about “clean background” trick that Howie mentions in this scene. As we discussed before, this concept could be seen as the whole basis of the book because of how Howie looks at each item so closely, almost as if removing it from the world and putting it against a clean background. Having a clean background makes items look better, and in The Mezzanine, even makes it seem like a work of art. Howie is amazed by the items he investigates in his mind, almost like someone at an art gallery.
Now, having thought about this, I can see all the more clearly as to why Howie would be triggered by Aurelius. I could already understand somewhat as I read the scene as to why Howie reacted the way he did because we already talked about his interest in these trivial, day-to-day items. However, now it is clear that he isn’t just intrigued by them, he sees them as works of art. He looks at a straw and can easily visualize all the work that went into creating an item that most people don’t even give a second glance at. Even with items he doesn’t like, such as the hot air dryer, Howie understands the process of its creation even if he doesn’t approve of it. He’s almost an art critic at times.
But like art, the triviality of these objects is subjective. Howie tries to get us to appreciate the art he sees, but it doesn’t always work. After all, we are all different individuals and art always presents an array of responses. Some people love a certain piece while others absolutely despise it. However, I do find that some of his metaphors and descriptions do catch my attention and I begin to rethink how I looked at certain items before. But the same items do not attract the same people, which has been evident in class discussion, with some of us getting intrigued by a particular item while others not really getting into it. I don’t know, I thought that it was kind of interesting on how Howie viewed the world in this way. Is anyone else seeing this?
I definitely can get behind this assessment of Howie's rational. Despite his strong opinions of different objects and their "backgrounds", he doesn't really choose favorites when it comes to actually making up hypotheses. He views each new observation as just as equally important as the last and doesn't leave out any detail when describing his opinions of them, a very art critic-esque way of looking at the world indeed.
ReplyDelete